KESIMPTA®▼ (ofatumumab) safety profile

KESIMPTA is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis with active disease defined by clinical or imaging features.1

KESIMPTA demonstrated a generally well-tolerated safety profile similar to teriflunomide, maintained up to 6 years.1–3

  • The safety profile of KESIMPTA versus teriflunomide was assessed in the double-blind ASCLEPIOS I and II trials.1,2

  • Patients enrolled in ASCLEPIOS I and II were eligible for entry into an open-label, long-term safety extension (ALITHIOS).3–5

On this page, you can find data for specific AEs associated with KESIMPTA versus teriflunomide, such as infection rates and injection-site reactions, treatment discontinuations and immunoglobulin (Ig) levels.

For full safety information, please refer to KESIMPTA Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) for further information.1


What are the most common adverse reactions with KESIMPTA?*

The most important and frequently reported adverse reactions with KESIMPTA are upper respiratory tract infections (39.4%), systemic injection-related reactions (20.6%), injection-site reactions (10.9%) and urinary tract infections (11.9%).1

Adverse events reported in the SmPC

Infections and infestations

Very common

Upper respiratory tract infections
Urinary tract infections

Common

Oral herpes

Immune system disorders

Not known

Hypersensitivity reactions§

General disorders and administration site conditions

Very common

Injection-site reactions (local)

Injury, poisoning and procedural complications

Very common

Injection-related reactions (systemic)

Gastrointestinal disorders

Common

Nausea, vomiting

Investigations

Common

Blood immunoglobulin M (IgM) decreased

Adapted from KESIMPTA Summary of Characteristics.1

Learn more about B-cell depletion data

What was the safety profile of KESIMPTA versus teriflunomide in the ASCLEPIOS trials?

 

ASCLEPIOS I and II study design:2

  • Two double-blind, double-dummy, Phase III trials1,2

  • Participants had relapsing multiple sclerosis

  • Participants were randomised to receive subcutaneous (SC) KESIMPTA (20 mg every 4 weeks after 20 mg loading doses at Days 1, 7, and 14) (n=946) or oral teriflunomide (14 mg daily) for up to 30 months (n=936)

 

KESIMPTA demonstrated a generally well-tolerated safety profile similar to teriflunomide in the ASCLEPIOS trials1

 

KESIMPTA adverse events (occurring in ≥5% of patients) versus teriflunomide2

 
 

KESIMPTA (n=946)

Teriflunomide (n=936)

Any AEs

791 (83.6)

788 (84.2)

Any serious AEs

86 (9.1)

74 (7.9)

Most common AEs (≥5% of patients in any treatment group)

Injection-related reactions (systemic)**

195 (20.6)

143 (15.3)

Nasopharyngitis

170 (18.0)

156 (16.7)

Headache

126 (13.3)

116 (12.4)

Injection-site reaction (local)

103 (10.9)

52 (5.6)

Upper respiratory tract infection

97 (10.3)

120 (12.8)

Urinary tract infection

97 (10.3)

78 (8.3)

Back pain

72 (7.6)

58 (6.2)

Fatigue

71 (7.5)

72 (7.7)

Influenza

62 (6.6)

59 (6.3)

Nausea

61 (6.4)

64 (6.8)

Blood IgM decreased

56 (5.9)

21 (2.2)

Alopecia

54 (5.7)

138 (14.7)

Arthralgia

49 (5.2)

44 (4.7)

Diarrhoea

49 (5.2)

111 (11.9)

Pain in extremity

46 (4.9)

66 (7.1)

Depression

45 (4.8)

48 (5.1)

Hypertension

35 (3.7)

55 (5.9)

Paresthesia

27 (2.9)

52 (5.6)

Data are n (%)

Adapted from Hauser SL, et al. 2020.2

 

Learn more about KESIMPTA’s mechanism of action

 

What was the rate of discontinuation for KESIMPTA and teriflunomide in the ASCLEPIOS trials?

Discontinuation:

KESIMPTA (n=946)

Teriflunomide (n=936)

Due to an AE

54 (5.7%)

49 (5.2%)

Due to an injection reaction (systemic)

1 (0.1%)

NA**

Adapted from Hauser SL, et al. 20202 and Cohen AH, et al. 2023.4

 

What was the 6-year safety profile of KESIMPTA in the ALITHIOS trial?

 
  • ALITHIOS study design:3

  • Open-label, single-arm, multi-centre extension of ASCLEPIOS I/II, APLIOS and APOLITOS trials

  • Objective: to assess the longer-term safety and efficacy of KESIMPTA treatment for up to 6 years in pwRMS

  • Efficacy population for ALITHIOS included 1882 who entered from ASCLEPIOS I/II (including continuous and switch KESIMPTA groups). Safety population for ALITHIOS includes patients from APLIOS and APOLITOS. A total of 1969 patients were included in the safety analysis

    • At data cut-off, September 2023, patients had experienced up to 6 years of KESIMPTA treatment

For further information on the clinical trials, please click here.

 

The safety profile of KESIMPTA remained consistent with up to 6 years of treatment3

 
  • No unexpected safety signals were identified3

  • The most common AEs were infections (COVID-19 [34.3%], nasopharyngitis [20.6%], upper respiratory tract infection [14.9%] and urinary tract infection [14.4%])3

  • EAIR for malignancies did not increase over time in the overall safety population3

  • The overall EAIR per 100 patient-years of serious infections was consistent with Phase III ASCLEPIOS I/II trials (EAIR: 1.55) and did not increase with treatment up to 6 years despite the COVID-19 pandemic; the most common serious infections were COVID-19 (1.4%)/COVID-19 pneumonia (1.3%),†† and appendicitis (0.8%)‡‡3

How does KESIMPTA impact IgG and IgM serum levels vs teriflunomide in the ALITHIOS trial?

 

ALITHIOS study design:3

  • Open-label, single-arm, multi-centre extension of ASCLEPIOS I/II, APLIOS and APOLITOS trials

  • Objective: to assess the longer-term safety and efficacy of KESIMPTA in pwRMS

  • Efficacy population for ALITHIOS included 1882 who entered from ASCLEPIOS I/II (including continuous and switch KESIMPTA groups). Safety population for ALITHIOS includes patients from APLIOS and APOLITOS. A total of 1969 patients were included in the safety analysis

    • At data cut-off, September 2023, patients had experienced up to 6 years of KESIMPTA treatment

  • For further information on the clinical trials, please click here.

Mean IgG levels remained generally stable in KESIMPTA-treated patients for up to 6 years3

 

KESIMPTA was associated with a transient decrease of 4.3% in mean IgG levels after 48 weeks of treatment but an increase of 2.2% after 96 weeks.1 Mean serum IgG levels remained stable for up to 6 years of treatment and the majority of patients (97.2%) had IgG levels above the LLN.3

The most important and frequently reported adverse reactions are upper respiratory tract infections (39.4%), systemic injection-related reactions (20.6%), injection-site reactions (10.9%) and urinary tract infections (11.9%).1

Mean serum IgG levels remained generally stable and above the LLN for up to 6 years in 97% of patients (data cut-off: Sept 2023)3

Image
Graph showing that the mean serum IgG levels remained above the LLN (5.65 g/L) in 97.2% of patients.

Adapted from Wiendl H, et al. 2024.3

Treatment interruption/discontinuation¶¶ between treatment groups was reported in 3 (0.2%)/ 4 (0.2%) participants due to low IgG. In ASCLEPIOS I/II, the investigators were required to interrupt study treatment if IgG levels fell 20% <LLN; due to a protocol amendment at the beginning of ALITHIOS (June 3, 2021), the requirement to interrupt treatment based on a specific threshold due to low IgG/IgM was removed, and the decision was left to the discretion of the investigator.3

Mean IgM levels decreased in both groups but remained above the LLN in most patients (66%) for up to 6 years3

 

In the Phase III clinical studies, a decrease in mean value of IgM (30.9% decrease after 48 weeks and 38.8% decrease after 96 weeks) was observed and no association with risk of infections, including serious infections, was shown.1

Post-hoc analysis showed that mean IgM levels decreased in both groups but remained above the LLN for up to 6 years in the majority of the patients (66% of patients); data cut off: Sept 20233

Image
Graph showing that the mean serum levels of IgM decreased in both groups, but remained above the LLN (0.40 g/L) in 65.9% of patients.

Adapted from Wiendl H, et al. 2024.3

Treatment interruption/discontinuation¶¶ between treatment groups was reported in 203 (10.3%)/71 (3.6%) participants due to low IgM. In ASCLEPIOS I/II, the investigators were required to interrupt study treatment if IgM levels fell 10% <LLN; due to a protocol amendment at the beginning of ALITHIOS (June 3, 2021), the requirement to interrupt treatment based on a specific threshold due to low IgG/IgM was removed, and the decision was left to the discretion of the investigator.3

No clinically meaningful association between IgM levels and risk of serious infections was observed1,3

How does KESIMPTA impact lymphocyte and neutrophil levels vs teriflunomide?

 

Lymphocyte levels3

Image
Line graph showing mean lymphocyte levels compared to teriflunomide throughout 4 years of treatment with KESIMPTA.

Adapted from Wiendl H, et al. 2024.3

Mean lymphocyte levels after Week 4 remained stable throughout 6 years of treatment with KESIMPTA (post-hoc analysis)3

 

A transient decline in mean lymphocytes was observed up to Week 4 (% change: continuous, −11.9%; switch, −8.2%), followed by an increase back to close to baseline in continuous and newly switched groups through Week 312.3

Neutrophil levels3

Image
Line graph showing mean neutrophil levels compared to teriflunomide. throughout 4 years of treatment with KESIMPTA.

Adapted from Wiendl H, et al. 2024.3

Mean neutrophil levels after Week 4 remained stable throughout 6 years of treatment with KESIMPTA (post-hoc analysis)3

 

Mean neutrophil levels remained stable and above baseline for all visits up to Year 6 with an increase in levels after switching from teriflunomide to KESIMPTA was observed.3

For full safety information, please refer to KESIMPTA Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).1

 

What are the KESIMPTA prescribing considerations?

 

Before treatment initiation with KESIMPTA, there are a variety of prescribing considerations and precautions to consider, alongside dosing and administration guidance.

 

 

Image
Icon of a hand representing Gd+ T1 lesions AND new or enlarging T2 lesions.

KESIMPTA contraindications1

 
  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients in KESIMPTA

  • Patients in a severely immunocompromised state

  • Severe active infection until resolution

  • Known active malignancy

Image
Label icon representing KESIMPTA traceability.

KESIMPTA traceability1

  
  • In order to improve the traceability of biological medicinal products, the name and the batch number of the administered product should be clearly recorded

Image
Exclamation mark icon.

KESIMPTA treatment of severely immunocompromised patients1

  
  • Patients in a severely immunocompromised state must not be treated until the condition resolves

  • It is not recommended to use other immunosuppressants concomitantly with KESIMPTA except corticosteroids for symptomatic treatment of relapses

Image
Syringe icon.

KESIMPTA vaccinations1

 
  • Vaccination with live or live-attenuated vaccines is not recommended during treatment with KESIMPTA and after discontinuation until B-cell repletion; all live or live-attenuated vaccines should be administered at least 4 weeks prior to start of treatment according to immunisation guidelines

  • KESIMPTA may interfere with the effectiveness of inactivated vaccines. Inactivated vaccines, whenever possible, should be administered at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of KESIMPTA according to immunisation guidelines 

Image
Icon of a home with a heart inside depicting paediatric population.

KESIMPTA pregnancy and family planning1

 
  • Women of childbearing potential should use effective contraception (methods that result in less than 1% pregnancy rates) while receiving KESIMPTA and for 6 months after the last administration of KESIMPTA, as there is a limited amount of data from the use of KESIMPTA in pregnant women

  • Treatment with KESIMPTA should be avoided during pregnancy unless the potential benefit to the mother outweighs the potential risk to the foetus

  • KESIMPTA may cross the placenta and cause foetal B-cell depletion based on findings from animal studies

  • The use of KESIMPTA in women during lactation has not been studied. It is unknown whether KESIMPTA is excreted in human milk. In humans, excretion of IgG antibodies in milk occurs during the first few days after birth, and decreases to low concentrations soon afterwards. Consequently, a risk to the breastfed child cannot be excluded during this short period. Afterwards, KESIMPTA could be used during breastfeeding if clinically needed. However, if the patient was treated with KESIMPTA up to the last few months of pregnancy, breastfeeding can be started immediately after birth

Image
Syringe icon.

KESIMPTA vaccination of infants born to mothers treated with KESIMPTA during pregnancy1

 
  • In infants of mothers treated with KESIMPTA during pregnancy live or live-attenuated vaccines should not be administered before the recovery of B-cell counts has been confirmed. Depletion of B-cells in these infants may increase the risks from live or live-attenuated vaccines

  • Inactivated vaccines may be administered as indicated prior to recovery from B-cell depletion; however, assessment of vaccine immune responses, including consultation with a qualified specialist, should be considered to determine whether a protective immune response was mounted

Image
Icon representing infections.

KESIMPTA infections1

 
  • It is recommended to evaluate the patient’s immune status prior to initiating therapy

  • Based on its mode of action and available clinical experience, KESIMPTA has the potential for an increased risk of infections. Administration should be delayed in patients with an active infection until the infection is resolved

  • KESIMPTA must not be given to patients in a severely immunocompromised state (e.g. significant neutropenia or lymphopenia)

  • John Cunningham virus (JCV): physicians should be vigilant for medical history of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and for any clinical symptoms or MRI findings that may be suggestive of PML. If PML is suspected, treatment with KESIMPTA should be suspended until PML has been excluded

Image
Circle with the letters HBV.

KESIMPTA hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation1

 
  • Hepatitis B reactivation has occurred in patients treated with anti-CD20 antibodies, which in some cases resulted in fulminant hepatitis, hepatic failure and death

  • Patients with active hepatitis B disease should not be treated with KESIMPTA. HBV screening should be performed in all patients before initiation of treatment. As a minimum, screening should include hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) testing. These can be complemented with other appropriate markers as per local guidelines. Patients with positive hepatitis B serology (either HBsAg or HBcAb) should consult a liver disease expert before the start of treatment and should be monitored and managed following local medical standards to prevent hepatitis B reactivation

Image
Sensoready pen icon.

KESIMPTA injection-related reactions1

 
  • Patients should be informed that systemic injection‑related reactions could occur, generally within 24 hours and predominantly following the first injection

  • Symptoms most frequently observed in RMS clinical studies include headache, myalgia, chills, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and were predominantly (99.8%) mild to moderate in severity. There were no life-threatening systemic injection‑related reactions reported in RMS clinical studies

  • Additional systemic injection‑related reactions reported in the post-marketing setting include rash, urticaria, dyspnoea and angioedema (e.g. tongue, pharyngeal or laryngeal swelling), and rare cases which were reported as anaphylaxis. While there were some cases which were serious and resulted in discontinuation of KESIMPTA treatment, there were also serious cases where patients were able to continue KESIMPTA treatment without further incidents

  • Some systemic injection‑related reactions symptoms may be clinically indistinguishable from Type 1 acute hypersensitivity reactions (IgE-mediated). A hypersensitivity reaction may present during any injection, although typically would not present with the first injection. For subsequent injections, more severe symptoms than previously experienced, or new severe symptoms, should prompt consideration of a potential hypersensitivity reaction. Patients with known IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to KESIMPTA must not be treated with KESIMPTA

  • Only limited benefit of premedication with steroids was seen in RMS clinical studies. Injection-related reactions can be managed with symptomatic treatment, should they occur. Therefore, use of premedication is not required

  • Injection site reaction (local) symptoms observed in clinical studies included erythema, swelling, itching and pain

  • The first injection should be performed under the guidance of an appropriately trained healthcare professional

Image
Icon of an immune cell.

Other immunosuppressive or immune-modulating therapies1

 
  • The risk of additive immune system effects should be considered when co-administering immunosuppressive therapies with KESIMPTA

  • When initiating KESIMPTA after other immunosuppressive therapies with prolonged immune effects or initiating other immunosuppressive therapies with prolonged immune effects after KESIMPTA, the duration and mode of action of these medicinal products should be taken into account because of potential additive immunosuppressive effects

Discover the resources available to HCPs and patients

Click here for more details about clinical trial designs

Refer to the SmPC for full prescribing and safety information.1

*Very common (≥1/10); common (≥1/100 to <1/10); uncommon (≥1/1,000 to <1/100); rare (≥1/10,000 to <1/1,000); very rare (<1/10,000) and not known (cannot be estimated from the available data).1
Grouping of preferred terms (PTs) was considered for adverse drug reaction (ADR) frequency determination and includes the following: nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, influenza, sinusitis, pharyngitis, rhinitis, viral upper respiratory infection, tonsillitis, acute sinusitis, pharyngotonsillitis, laryngitis, pharyngitis streptococcal, viral rhinitis, sinusitis bacterial, tonsillitis bacterial, viral pharyngitis, viral tonsillitis, chronic sinusitis, nasal herpes, tracheitis.1
Grouping of preferred terms (PTs) was considered for ADR frequency determination and includes the following: urinary tract infection, cystitis, Escherichia urinary tract infection, asymptomatic bacteriuria, bacteriuria.1
§Reported during post-marketing experience.1
Nausea and vomiting have been reported in association with systemic injection-related reactions.1
Patients in the teriflunomide arm received a matching placebo injection to ensure blinding (double-dummy design).2
**Only reactions or symptoms that occurred within 24 hours after injection are included (i.e., time to onset of reaction ≤24 hours).2
††There are n=49 COVID-19–related SAEs in total, one of them has PT of “suspected COVID-19”; and a majority (85.71%) of the cases recovered.3
‡‡All cases of appendicitis recovered, and a majority of them were not related to KESIMPTA treatment.3
§§Switching period refers to the participants started on teriflunomide and not applicable to the participants on KESIMPTA in the core period. For the teriflunomide/KESIMPTA group, data from the first dose of teriflunomide until the last dose of KESIMPTA plus 100 days or analysis cut-off date has been used. R1: The first participant with first treatment-emergent assessment in KESIMPTA period after switching to KESIMPTA (72 weeks); R2: The last participant with last treatment-emergent assessment in teriflunomide period before switching to KESIMPTA (120 weeks). For all pooled analyses, a fixed value of LLN (using ALITHIOS study reference) was used: IgG: 5.65 g/L, IgM: 0.4 g/L, lymphocyte: 0.91x109/L and neutrophil: 1.96x109/L.3
¶¶In ASCLEPIOS I/II, the investigators were required to interrupt study treatment if IgM levels fell 10% <LLN or IgG levels fell 20% <LLN; due to a protocol amendment at the beginning of ALITHIOS (June 3, 2021), the requirement to interrupt treatment based on a specific threshold due to low IgG/IgM was removed, and the decision was left to the discretion of the investigator.3

ADR, adverse drug reaction; AE, adverse event; BL, baseline; EAIR, exposure-adjusted incidence rates; ECG, electrocardiogram; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCP, healthcare professional; Ig, immunoglobulin; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M; JCV, John Cunningham virus; LLN, lower limit of normal; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NA, not applicable; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; PT, preferred term; pwRMS, people with relapsing multiple sclerosis; RMS, relapsing multiple sclerosis; SC, subcutaneous; SmPC, summary of product characteristics.

References

  1. KESIMPTA (ofatumumab) Summary of Product Characteristics.

  2. Hauser SL, et al. New Engl J Med 2020;383:546–557 and supplementary material.

  3. Wiendl H, et al. Poster P9.010. American Academy of Neurology, April 2024. 

  4. Cohen JA, et al. Poster P8.004. American Academy of Neurology (AAN), April 2023.

  5. Clinicaltrials.gov. Long-term Safety, Tolerability and Effectiveness Study of Ofatumumab in Patients With Relapsing MS (ALITHIOS) (NCT03650114). Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03650114 [Accessed January 2025].

UK | January 2025 | 443397

Adverse events should be reported. Reporting forms and information can be found at www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard. Adverse events should also be reported to Novartis online through the pharmacovigilance intake (PVI) tool at www.novartis.com/report, or alternatively email [email protected] or call 01276 698370.